Diagnostics vs. Gut Feeling: What Actually Leads to Better Decisions?

Introduction

We all know the boardroom moment: a hiring manager says, “I just had a gut feeling,” while someone else produces a stack of test results. Instinct feels fast and personal—but does it outperform structured data? Let’s find out.

Why gut feeling still dominates

Making decisions by intuition is tempting—it feels human, quick, and dynamic. Especially in small teams, where culture fit and chemistry seem critical. But gut feeling is a loaded shortcut. It often reflects biases, experiences, and sometimes nothing at all.

What diagnostics really offer

Before a test is even considered, effective diagnostics begin with the critical step of defining what the role actually requires. This involves identifying key competencies, behaviors, or abilities—essentially creating a job or personality profile. That internal alignment is the true value: knowing what success looks like ensures your hiring is purposeful and fit-for-purpose. Only then do structured tools bring in transparency, comparison, and reliability—because everyone’s measured against the same clarified benchmark. That foundational clarity is why diagnostics leave gut feeling in the dust before you even test a candidate.

See five assessment tools in one guide that help you move beyond gut feeling

Go to the guide →

What science says

Meta-analyses clearly show that structured methods, like standardized interviews and situational judgment tests (SJTs), predict job performance much better than ad-hoc, unstructured methods. One meta-analysis reported a validity coefficient of 0.47 for structured interviews versus 0.38 for unstructured ones . Other studies confirm structured interviews consistently double the predictive accuracy of unstructured formats.

When hiring for complex roles, intuition only improves outcomes if expert-deciders already have structured data. A 2021 study in Journal of Management & Organization found that experienced interviewers make better final calls—but only after neutral data exists; intuition alone was not enough .

When gut feeling misleads—and when it helps

Gut feeling can be seductive—and dangerous. It skews toward familiarity, can mask biases, and sometimes ignores deeper issues. But does that mean intuition has no value? Absolutely not. Once diagnostics narrow things down—say you’re left with two equally qualified candidates—that intuitive spark can tip the scale. It won’t tell you who will perform better, but it can tell you who you’re naturally drawn to, who fits the team vibe, or whose communication style clicks. That personal insight is valid—but only after diagnostics finish their job.